March 26, 2005

Raphael speaks # 2

> > the only pattern i see is your opinions masquerading
> > as fact.
> > i would argue that the real fact is that we don't
> > know what terry shiavo's
> > wishes are. all we know is that her husband claims
> > that it was her wish to
> > die and he is her legal guardian in the state of
> > florida.
> > if you think that that means that therefore, "it is
> > an undisputable fact
> > that cannot be contested that terry shiavo wishes to
> > die" and that
> > “therefore, we should honor that undisputable wish
> > to die by starving a
> > woman over the course of two weeks," i suggest you
> > start by taking a course
> > in logic at your local community college.
> > from my viewing, cnn and the networks are stressing
> > michael shiavos pov and
> > his "love and respect for his wife's wishes," while
> > fox and internet sources
> > like newsmax are reporting the other side, such as
> > the nurses reports.
> > since when is reporting nurses reports not mentioned
> > in mainstream media
> > slander? because you think it is? you're treating
> > two nurses observations
> > the same as inuendo from a friend. they're not the same.
> > if you and debbie paid more than superficial
> > attention, you would know that
> > i culled additional "slander" from tom sowell and
> > charles krauthammer.
> > or that leading liberal thinkers such as alan
> > dershowitz and clinton legal
> > counsel lani davis have come out for leaving terri
> > shiavo connected and
> > alive. neither one of you has mentioned this.
> > liberal commentators like Chris Matthews and Andrea
> > Mitchell say they’re ambivalent.
> > Did you bring up the liberals on shiavos side at
> > all? Did you bring up the
> > issue of whether a new law should be passed in
> > regards to erring on the side
> > of life when there’s a family dispute and no living will.
> > why bother, when as i said in the beginning, your
> > opinions are the facts.
> > finally thanks for implying that i'm a dupe and a
> > mindless idiot that runs with the herd and doesn't know
> > what slander is because i respond to debbie's comment
> > about the real michael shiavo with emails on the subject.
> > Another fact is that it's not only the so-called
> > brainless hysterical
> > christian mob and by implication, brainless raphael
> > who doesn't want
> > this woman to be put to a slow death when her
> > parents are willing to take
> > care of her. even dershowitz agrees that since the
> > husband has a family, he
> > should turn over guardianship to the shiavos.
> > if there's one thing we all agree on it's that frank
> > and debbie are smarter than charles krauthammer
> > and alan dershowitz, a conservative and
> > liberal that support terry shiavo.
> > as debbie said "it's a no-brainer" (haha) and as frank
> > put it "she could play with the bush twins" heh heh.
> > i say this with love:
> > fuck you too, you shallow arrogant poser twit.
> > you're josh hartnett without
> > the deep thinking.

No comments: